WELL AND WELL v WELLBE: assessment of the likelihood of confusion based on the relevant public’s understanding of the marks

WELL AND WELL v WELLBE: assessment of the likelihood of confusion based on the relevant public’s understanding of the marks

Source Node: 1926629

European Union

Legal updates: case law analysis and intelligence

The word element ‘well’, as regards the part of the relevant public which understands its meaning in English, has a low degree of distinctiveness for goods/services which are connected to a person’s physical wellbeing.

Time Stamp:

More from World Trademark Review