House Rejects Bill Proposed by Rep. Gaetz to Remove U.S. Troops from Syria

Source Node: 2001042

On Thursday, the U.S. House of Representatives rejected a bill proposed by Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) that would have removed U.S. troops from Syria. The bill, which was introduced in March, was defeated by a vote of 174-249.

The bill would have required the President to withdraw all U.S. troops from Syria within 30 days and prohibited the deployment of any additional troops. It also included a provision that would have prevented the use of funds for military operations in Syria unless Congress approved them.

Supporters of the bill argued that the U.S. should not be involved in Syria’s civil war, and that the presence of U.S. troops was not helping to bring peace to the region. They also argued that the U.S. should focus on other foreign policy issues, such as the threat posed by North Korea and Iran.

However, opponents of the bill argued that removing U.S. troops from Syria would create a power vacuum that could be filled by Russia and Iran, both of which are allies of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. They argued that the presence of U.S. troops was necessary to prevent these countries from gaining too much influence in the region.

The bill was also opposed by some members of the Trump administration, including Secretary of Defense James Mattis, who argued that the presence of U.S. troops was necessary to ensure that ISIS does not reemerge in the region.

Ultimately, the House rejected Rep. Gaetz’s bill, but the debate over the presence of U.S. troops in Syria is likely to continue in the future. As the situation in Syria continues to evolve, it remains to be seen whether or not the U.S. will decide to keep its troops in the region or withdraw them altogether.

Time Stamp:

More from Defense / Web3