A SEC házon belüli bíráinak vitáinak feltárása

A SEC házon belüli bíráinak vitáinak feltárása

Időbélyeg: 29. november 2023. 12:29
Forrás csomópont: 2988642

rendelet | 29. november 2023

Unsplash Sasun Bughdaryan Judges gavel and money - Exploring the Controversy of SEC's In-House JudgesUnsplash Sasun Bughdaryan Judges gavel and money - Exploring the Controversy of SEC's In-House Judges Kép: Unsplash/Sasun Bughdaryan

Elon Musk and Mark Cuban Support Legal Challenge Against SEC’s In-House Judges

Elon Musk and Mark Cuban are backing hedge-fund manager George Jarkesy in a significant legal battle against the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This case, now before the US Supreme Court, questions the SEC’s use of in-house judges for imposing penalties. Jarkesy’s argument, supported by Musk and Cuban, is centered on the constitutional right of defendants in SEC cases to have a jury trial. This challenge could reshape how the SEC and potentially other regulatory bodies like the Federal Trade Commission conduct their enforcement actions.

The Problems with Conflicts and Power Imbalance

The problem with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) using in-house judges primarily revolves around concerns of fairness, constitutional rights, and the balance of power in regulatory enforcement. Here are some key points of contention:

  • The central issue is the SEC’s ability to bring cases before its own administrative law judges (ALJs) instead of federal courts. Critics argue that this denies defendants the constitutional right to a jury trial, which is seen as a fundamental aspect of the American legal system.
  • Van egy perception that in-house judges may be biased in favor of the SEC, as they are part of the same organization. This raises concerns about impartiality and the fairness of the proceedings.

Lásd:  Gensler megjegyzései a 2023-as értékpapír-végrehajtási fórumon

  • In SEC administrative proceedings, defendants often have limited rights compared to federal court trials. For example, they may have limited discovery rights, meaning less access to evidence and information held by the SEC.
  • A SEC’s administrative proceedings can allow for the use of hearsay evidence, which would typically not be admissible in federal court. This can put defendants at a disadvantage.
  • Appeals from these in-house decisions go directly to the SEC Commissioners, who are involved in the initial decision to bring the case. Critics argue this creates a összeférhetetlenség and undermines the fairness of the fellebbezési eljárás.
  • The SEC has the discretion to decide whether a case is heard in federal court or by an in-house judge. This discretion can be seen as giving the SEC too much power in determining the venue, potentially influencing the outcome.
  • A use of SEC in-house judges has faced several constitutional challenges, including questions about the appointment process of these judges and their insulation from executive branch oversight.
  • Impact on Enforcement Practices: If the SEC is limited in its use of in-house judges, it could affect the agency’s ability to efficiently and effectively enforce securities laws. This could have broader implications for market regulation and investor protection.

Lásd:  Spending Bill vs. SEC’s Crypto Grip

The ongoing legal challenges, including the case backed by Elon Musk and Mark Cuban, highlight these issues and could lead to significant changes in how the SEC conducts its enforcement actions.

Background on George Jarkesy’s Case

  • George Jarkesy, accused by the SEC in 2013 of misleading investors, is challenging the SEC’s internal judicial process. He argues for the right to a federal jury trial in such cases.  The Supreme Court is considering whether to limit the SEC’s ability to use in-house judges, a decision that could significantly impact the agency’s enforcement strategy.
  • A ruling in favor of Jarkesy could affect not only the SEC but also other federal agencies that use in-house judges, like the Federal Trade Commission.  Critics of the SEC’s current system argue it lacks fairness, as defendants have limited rights compared to those in federal courts, and the SEC decides which cases are handled in-house.

Lásd:  Hester Peirce megerősíti, hogy a SEC jelenlegi kriptográfiai megközelítése „nem jó módja a szabályozásnak”

  • Elon Musk and Mark Cuban, both of whom have had their own run-ins with the SEC, are supporting Jarkesy’s case, highlighting its potential impact on future SEC enforcement actions.

Az ügy jelentősége

This case challenges the fundamental process of how regulatory bodies like the SEC conduct enforcement. A decision in favor of Jarkesy could lead to more defendants opting for jury trials, potenciálisan elkészítheti harder for the SEC to secure settlements and enforce regulations. It also raises significant questions about the balance of power between regulatory agencies and the rights of individuals and companies in the financial sector.  The decision, expected by June 2024, will be closely watched by investors, legal experts, and regulatory bodies.

NCFA Jan 2018 resize - Exploring the Controversy of SEC's In-House Judges

NCFA Jan 2018 resize - Exploring the Controversy of SEC's In-House JudgesA Nemzeti Crowdfunding & Fintech Szövetség (NCFA Canada) egy pénzügyi innovációs ökoszisztéma, amely oktatást, piaci intelligenciát, iparági felügyeletet, hálózatépítési és finanszírozási lehetőségeket és szolgáltatásokat biztosít a közösség több ezer tagjának, és szorosan együttműködik az iparral, a kormányzattal, a partnerekkel és a leányvállalatokkal egy élénk és innovatív fintech és finanszírozás létrehozása érdekében. ipar Kanadában. A decentralizált és elosztott NCFA együttműködik a globális érdekelt felekkel, és segít a projektek és befektetések inkubálásában a fintech, az alternatív finanszírozás, a közösségi finanszírozás, a peer-to-peer finanszírozás, a fizetések, a digitális eszközök és tokenek, a mesterséges intelligencia, a blokklánc, a kriptovaluta, a regtech és az insurtech szektorokban. . Csatlakozik Kanada Fintech és finanszírozási közössége ma INGYENES! Vagy váljon a közreműködő tag és jutalmakat kap. További információért látogasson el a következő oldalra: www.ncfacanada.org

Kapcsolódó hozzászólások

Időbélyeg:

Még több NC homlokzat Ada