Recently, the Delhi High Court clarified that the distinctness, uniformity and stability (DUS) testing is a must before a plant variety registration application can be advertised by the Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Authority. SpicyIP Intern Veda Chawla discusses this order. Vedika is a third-year B.A.LL.B. (Hons.) student at National Law University, Delhi. Her previous posts can be accessed اینجا کلیک نمایید.
Nuziveedu v. Plant Varieties Authority: Reaping the Fruits of Pioneer's Seeds
نوشته ودیکا چاولا
In an artfully written judgement, The Delhi High Court on 30 November 2023 حکومت that distinctness, uniformity and stability (DUS) testing must necessarily precede the advertising of an application for registration of a plant variety under the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Act, 2001 (“the PPV Act”). But what is DUS testing? It is a procedure through which the plant variety is grown across two separate but different seasons and at two different locations in order to test it for a detailed list of characteristics, such as seed colour, rate of flowering, etc. Detailed guidelines on how DUS testing is performed on different plant varieties may be found اینجا کلیک نمایید.
In the present case, Nuziveedu Seeds Pvt. Ltd v. the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmer Rights Authority, multiple applications for registration of plant varieties had been filed, including by the Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Company Pvt. Ltd. (“Mahyco”) and Sungro Seeds Research Ltd. (“Sungro”), which were sent for DUS testing but also advertised before the testing results came in. Subsequently, writ petitions were filed against the Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Authority for failing to follow the statute. The Court disposed of the five writ petitions and reiterated the principle that where a statute prescribes something to be done in a certain manner, it must necessarily be done in that manner and none other. (For a related discussion on the PPV Act and its arbitrariness, read the three-part post by Adarsh Ramanujan اینجا کلیک نمایید, اینجا کلیک نمایید و اینجا کلیک نمایید.)
Relevant Provisions from the Statute
For a general background, بخش 15 of the PPV Act delineates the requirements for a registrable variety, in accordance with which an applicant may make an application for registering a novel or extant variety. Once an application is made, under بخش 19, the applicant is also required to provide sufficient quantities of the seed for testing by the Registrar so that their conformity with standards as specified under regulations can be checked. The Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Regulations, 2006 (“2006 Regulations”) formulated under the Act, in Regulation 11, provide that the standards for testing under the Act shall be distinctness, uniformity and stability (explained above). Under بخش 20, the Registrar may, after conducting such inquiry with respect to the particulars contained in such application as he deems fit, accept the application absolutely or after amendments, and thereafter advertise the application so accepted to call for objections under بخش 21.
The primary question in the present case was this: Does the Section 20-21 procedure necessarily require the testing under Section 19 to be completed, or can the two happen simultaneously? The latter is what happened in the facts of the case, as four of the nine applications, with respect to which the Court passed orders, were advertised while the DUS testing results had not been received. The confusion is amplified in light of the Public Notice of 1 March, 2012, which mandated that از حالا به بعد, all applications must be subject to DUS testing before acceptance. The present applications, however, were filed before 2012.
Can Advertisement and DUS Testing Take Place Simultaneously?
The provisions detailed above are perhaps an excellent example of legalese that has the potential of allowing common sense to get lost in it. When read plainly, as the Court also observed, Sections 20 and 21 place no requirement on the Registrar to conduct any testing. While Section 19 provides that testing is to be conducted, there is nothing that clearly prevents the Registrar from accepting an application before the DUS test reports have been received – that’s where the Court steps in to explain.
Lauding the wisdom of the Court in Pioneer Overseas Corporation v. Chairperson Protection of Plant Varieties Rights, Hari Shankar, J., highlighted that the decision in that case “concludes the controversy.” In Pioneer Overseas also applications filed before 2012 were advertised prior to the receipt of DUS testing reports. the Court clarified that the processes of DUS testing and advertising could not be conducted simultaneously and interpreted that Section 20 places an onus on the Registrar to conduct ‘such inquiry as he deems fit’ before proceeding to accept and advertise an application. In the proper discharge of this duty, the Court opined, the Registrar would necessarily have to wait for the DUS testing reports, as they constitute an important element of the requirements for registration of new varieties. As explained above, the Regulations provide that the testing should fulfill the criteria of distinctness, uniformity and stability. Recognizing this, the court held that the DUS testing, as provided for under the 2006 Regulations, must essentially be considered an element of the ‘inquiry’ of the Registrar before accepting and advertising the particulars of an application. The Court also noted that where the Registrar, as part of the inquiry, otherwise identifies a sufficiently major issue with the application, s/he is not bound to wait for the DUS testing before rejecting the application. However, where the Registrar has no other reasons to reject the application, s/he must wait for the DUS results and act accordingly. Simply put, a positive DUS testing report is a necessary, but not a sufficient condition for acceptance of the application by the Registrar. Through a brief discussion about the purpose of the Act – protection of farmers’ interests – the Court also highlighted that the purpose of advertising an application is to make available all details about the plant variety so applied to be registered, allowing farmers and other stakeholders to make objections accordingly. If an application is advertised before DUS testing reports are received, the purpose is defeated, which certainly may not be permitted under the scheme of the Act.
Referring to excerpts from Pioneer that form a significant part of the judgement, Hari Shankar, J., noted: “So pellucid, indeed, is the enunciation of the legal position in the above passages, that any attempt at paraphrasing would do injustice.” It is, indeed, only in good sense that this be the understanding of the provisions in order to further the underlying purpose of the Act, otherwise ridden with many complications (discussed further in a series of prior posts, starting اینجا کلیک نمایید).
- محتوای مبتنی بر SEO و توزیع روابط عمومی. امروز تقویت شوید.
- PlatoData.Network Vertical Generative Ai. به خودت قدرت بده دسترسی به اینجا.
- PlatoAiStream. هوش وب 3 دانش تقویت شده دسترسی به اینجا.
- PlatoESG. کربن ، CleanTech، انرژی، محیط، خورشیدی، مدیریت پسماند دسترسی به اینجا.
- PlatoHealth. هوش بیوتکنولوژی و آزمایشات بالینی. دسترسی به اینجا.
- منبع: https://spicyip.com/2024/01/nuziveedu-v-plant-varieties-authority-reaping-the-fruits-of-pioneers-seeds.html
- : دارد
- :است
- :نه
- :جایی که
- 1
- 11
- 12
- 19
- 20
- 2001
- 2006
- 2012
- 2023
- 225
- 30
- a
- درباره ما
- بالاتر
- کاملا
- پذیرفتن
- پذیرش
- پذیرفته
- پذیرش
- مطابقت
- بر این اساس
- در میان
- عمل
- تبلیغات
- تبلیغات
- تبلیغات
- پس از
- در برابر
- معرفی
- اجازه دادن
- همچنین
- اصلاحات
- تقویت
- an
- و
- هر
- کاربرد
- برنامه های کاربردی
- اعمال می شود
- هستند
- AS
- At
- کوشش
- قدرت
- در دسترس
- b
- زمینه
- BE
- بوده
- قبل از
- بسته
- اما
- by
- صدا
- آمد
- CAN
- مورد
- معین
- قطعا
- مشخصات
- بررسی شده
- روشن
- به وضوح
- مشترک
- عقل سلیم
- شرکت
- تکمیل شده
- عوارض
- شرط
- رفتار
- انجام
- انجام
- گیجی
- در نظر گرفته
- را تشکیل می دهند
- موجود
- مباحثه
- شرکت
- میتوانست
- دادگاه
- ضوابط
- تصمیم
- دهلی نو
- دقیق
- جزئیات
- مختلف
- بحث کردیم
- گفتگو
- do
- میکند
- انجام شده
- عنصر
- اساسا
- و غیره
- اتر (ETH)
- مثال
- عالی
- توضیح دهید
- توضیح داده شده
- فیس بوک
- حقایق
- عدم
- کشاورزان
- واصل
- مناسب
- پنج
- به دنبال
- برای
- فرم
- یافت
- چهار
- از جانب
- میوه ها
- تکمیل کنید
- بیشتر
- سوالات عمومی
- دریافت کنید
- خوب
- رشد کرد
- دستورالعمل ها
- بود
- رخ دادن
- اتفاق افتاده است
- آیا
- he
- برگزار شد
- او
- زیاد
- برجسته
- چگونه
- اما
- HTML
- HTTPS
- ترکیبی
- شناسایی می کند
- if
- مهم
- in
- از جمله
- بی عدالتی
- پرس و جو
- منافع
- موضوع
- IT
- ITS
- قانون
- قانونی
- سبک
- فهرست
- ll
- مکان
- از دست رفته
- با مسئولیت محدود
- ساخته
- عمده
- ساخت
- روش
- بسیاری
- مارس
- حداکثر عرض
- ممکن است..
- چندگانه
- باید
- ملی
- لزوما
- لازم
- جدید
- نه نفر
- نه
- هیچ
- اشاره کرد
- هیچ چی
- اطلاع..
- رمان
- نوامبر
- مشاهده
- of
- on
- یک بار
- فقط
- تعهد
- or
- سفارش
- سفارشات
- دیگر
- در غیر این صورت
- خارج
- بخش
- معابر
- گذشت
- انجام
- شاید
- پیشگام
- محل
- اماکن
- گیاه
- افلاطون
- هوش داده افلاطون
- PlatoData
- موقعیت
- مثبت
- پست
- پست ها
- پتانسیل
- ppv
- در حال حاضر
- جلوگیری از
- قبلی
- اصلی
- اصل
- قبلا
- روش
- فرآیندهای
- مناسب
- حفاظت
- ارائه
- ارائه
- فراهم می کند
- عمومی
- هدف
- قرار دادن
- سوال
- نرخ
- خواندن
- درو کردن
- دلایل
- اخذ شده
- شناختن
- ثبت نام
- ثبت نام
- ثبت کننده
- ثبت
- تنظیم
- مقررات
- مربوط
- گزارش
- گزارش ها
- نیاز
- ضروری
- نیاز
- مورد نیاز
- تحقیق
- احترام
- نتایج
- حقوق
- طرح
- فصل
- بخش
- بخش
- دانه
- دانه
- حس
- فرستاده
- جداگانه
- سلسله
- باید
- قابل توجه
- به سادگی
- به طور همزمان
- So
- چیزی
- مشخص شده
- ثبات
- سهامداران
- استانداردهای
- راه افتادن
- مراحل
- دانشجو
- موضوع
- متعاقبا
- چنین
- کافی
- گرفتن
- آزمون
- تست
- که
- La
- شان
- آنجا.
- آنها
- این
- از طریق
- به
- دو
- زیر
- اساسی
- درک
- دانشگاه
- تنوع
- صبر کنيد
- بود
- بود
- چی
- چه شده است
- چه زمانی
- که
- در حین
- خرد
- با
- خواهد بود
- کتبی
- زفیرنت