From Poetry to changing definitions of Transborder Reputation – we had some interesting posts on the blog this week! To read these, along with a round up of IP developments around the country, and world, read on below.
Anything we’re missing out on? Please drop a comment and let us know.
نکات مهم هفته
فناوری بولت در مقابل فناوری Ujoy: متقاطع شهرت و حسن نیت
Reputation and Goodwill: Not Really ‘Tomato-Tomahto’? The DHC’s verbose order distinguishing between ‘goodwill’ and ‘reputation’ resets the debate on the fundamentals of transborder reputation claims in trademark litigation. Read Tejaswini’s post on this to know more!
Jab "We" Met: When Intellectual Property (IP) Met Public Interest (PI) ، شعری
When IP met PI (Public Interest)! Ever wonder how they’d describe themselves to each other? Lokesh, in this lovely poem, describes how he’d imagine that conversation would happen, highlighting the overlap between the two. Click to read!
سایر ارسال ها
آیا نوشته روی دیوار است؟ رمزگشایی هنر خیابانی، استفاده منصفانه و حقوق اخلاقی
Is usage of Mural art, in commercial advertisements covered by Fair use? The DHC to explore this issue in light of Acko- St. Art Sassoon Dock mural controversy. Read Yogesh’s detailed post examining the issues concerning copyrightability, permanent fixation, and the mural’s setting.
وبینار در مورد "بهبود مقررات دارویی برای دسترسی بیشتر به بیولوژیک ها و واکسن ها" [دسامبر 08]
Third World Network (TWN) organized a one-hour discussion (with Q&A) on improving the drug regulatory system to create better access to biologics and vaccines on December 08.
خلاصه موارد
The Delhi High Court granted an ad interim injunction to the plaintiff against the defendant’s use of “Tumotin” mark. The court held that the defendant’s mark is deceptively similar to the plaintiff’s “Tumorin” trademark. Concerning the contention of the defendant that the plaintiff’s trademark should not have been registered in the first place, the court held that Section 31(1) provides for a presumption of validity of a registered trademark and thus dismissed this argument in the context of determining the question of infringement. The court clarified that the above issue may be relevant in determining the relief.
The Delhi High Court issued a summon to the defendant, a co-founder of the plaintiff’s company for using an allegedly identical “Brine” mark.
Castrol Limited & Anr. vs Voltranic India Lubricants & Ors. on 30 November, 2023 (Delhi High Court)
The plaintiff filed a suit against the defendants alleging infringement of their trademarks “Activ” “Radicool”, “GTX”, “Power 1”, “Magnetic” and “Edge” which were used in conjunction with the defendant’s “Voltronic” mark. Previously an ex-parte interim injunction was granted by the court. However, the defendant entered an appearance later and agreed to suffer the decree. The court perused the images of the competing products and held that the defendant is engaging in manufacturing counterfeit products. Consequently, the court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff and directed the defendants to pay costs of INR 1 lakh to the plaintiff.
Frankfinn Aviation Services vs Tata Sia Airlines Ltd. on 4 December, 2023 (Delhi High Court)
The suit pertains to the defendant’s use of “Fly Higher” phrase. The plaintiff had alleged that the term “Fly Higher” infringes its “Fly High” mark. However, earlier the court had clarified that the defendant’s use of the term was not as a trademark but as a descriptive term. After the earlier order, the parties made a proposal wherein they agreed that the defendant wouldn’t file a trademark application for the term “Fly Higher” and the plaintiff shall not intervene in the use of the term as a keyword, in advertising or as a hashtag. The court held that the parties will be bound by the above terms and disposed of the suit.
Alkem Laboratories Ltd vs Medox Lifesciences & Ors on 4 December, 2023 (Delhi High Court)
The plaintiff filed the present suit alleging infringement of its trademark “A To Z” by the defendant’s use of “A 2 Z”. Relying on the Cadila principles for confusion in the case of pharmaceutical products, the court held that the competing marks are deceptively similar and granted an ad interim injunction to the plaintiff.
Hind Chemicals Ltd. vs Mr. Rajesh Chawla & Ors. on 1 December, 2023 (Delhi High Court)
The plaintiff filed the present suit alleging that the defendant had infringed its trademark ‘SU-MAG’ and copyright of the of its packaging by using deceptively similar ‘GUDMAG’ mark and a similar packing. An interim injunction was granted to the plaintiff in 2006 and the suit was pending for 17 years. After the conclusion of the trial, the court granted a permanent injunction to the plaintiff, holding the competing marks and packing to be deceptively similar and imposed INR 3 lakhs on the defendant relying on two factors- a) Profit earned by the infringing party, and b) Duration of income, as under Rule 20 of the IPD Rules.
Nif Private Limited vs Registrar Of Trade Marks on 5 December, 2023 (Delhi High Court)
The present appeal was filed against the orders of the respondent rejecting its trademark application. The impugned orders rejected the applications without any reason and directed the appellant to ask for reasons separately, under Rule 36. The court observed that Rule 36(1) violated due procedure and should be open to challenge. Regarding the impugned orders, the court held that though the orders state that the applications were rejected based on section 9(1)(a) and 9(1)(b), reasons behind the applicability of the said provisions was not given therein. Thus the court set aside the impugned order and directed to hear the matter afresh.
Indarmal M Solanki vs Rakesh Gupta And Anr on 1 December, 2023 (Delhi High Court)
The present application was filed by the plaintiff seeking cancellation of the respondent’s trademark ‘EL PASO’. The plaintiff argued that the defendant’s mark is similar to its registered ‘ELPASO’ trademark and the defendant has not renewed the impugned mark since 2017. The court held that the respondent’s mark was identical to the petitioner’s mark and since they target the same consumer base and are identical goods, the registration granted to the respondent would cause public confusion and thus directed for its removal/ cancellation.
Burger King Corporation vs Swapnil Patil & Ors on 4 December, 2023 (Delhi High Court)
The Delhi High Court granted a dynamic injunction against the use of plaintiff’s “Burger King” mark. The order directed DNRs and MEITY to block websites illegally offering fraud franchise of the plaintiff’s restaurant chain, whenever the details of the same are communicated to them by the plaintiff.
سایر پیشرفت ها
توسعه IP بین المللی
- محتوای مبتنی بر SEO و توزیع روابط عمومی. امروز تقویت شوید.
- PlatoData.Network Vertical Generative Ai. به خودت قدرت بده دسترسی به اینجا.
- PlatoAiStream. هوش وب 3 دانش تقویت شده دسترسی به اینجا.
- PlatoESG. کربن ، CleanTech، انرژی، محیط، خورشیدی، مدیریت پسماند دسترسی به اینجا.
- PlatoHealth. هوش بیوتکنولوژی و آزمایشات بالینی. دسترسی به اینجا.
- منبع: https://spicyip.com/2023/12/spicyipweekly-review-december-4-december-10.html
- : دارد
- :است
- :نه
- $UP
- 08
- 1
- 10
- 17
- 20
- 2006
- 2017
- 2023
- 30
- 36
- 700
- a
- بالاتر
- دسترسی
- Ad
- تبلیغات
- پس از
- در برابر
- موافقت کرد
- AIR
- هواپیمایی
- ادعا شده است
- ادعا شده
- در امتداد
- an
- و
- هر
- هر چیزی
- استیناف
- کاربرد
- برنامه های کاربردی
- هستند
- استدلال کرد
- استدلال
- دور و بر
- هنر
- AS
- کنار
- پرسیدن
- هوانوردی
- b
- زمینه
- پایه
- مستقر
- BE
- بوده
- پشت سر
- در زیر
- بهتر
- میان
- بیولوژیک
- مسدود کردن
- بلاگ
- پیچ
- بسته
- قهوهای
- اما
- by
- مورد
- علت
- زنجیر
- به چالش
- متغیر
- مواد شیمیایی
- ادعای
- روشن
- کلیک
- بنیانگذاران
- توضیح
- تجاری
- ارتباط
- شرکت
- رقابت
- در باره
- نتیجه
- گیجی
- پیوستگی
- در نتیجه
- مصرف کننده
- زمینه
- مباحثه
- گفتگو
- حق چاپ
- شرکت
- هزینه
- جعلی
- کشور
- دادگاه
- پوشش داده شده
- کرم
- ایجاد
- خالق
- مناظره
- دسامبر
- رمز گشایی
- حكم
- متهمان
- تعاریف
- دهلی نو
- توصیف
- دقیق
- جزئیات
- تعیین
- تحولات
- جهت دار
- گفتگو
- بارانداز
- قطره
- دارو
- دو
- مدت
- پویا
- هر
- پیش از آن
- به دست آورده
- جذاب
- وارد
- اتر (ETH)
- تا کنون
- در حال بررسی
- اکتشاف
- منصفانه
- توجه
- پرونده
- واصل
- نام خانوادگی
- برای
- حق رای دادن
- تقلب
- از جانب
- اصول
- داده
- مغازه
- حسن نیت
- اعطا شده
- بیشتر
- سبز
- گوپتا
- بود
- رخ دادن
- hashtag
- آیا
- شنیدن
- برگزار شد
- زیاد
- مشخص کردن
- برگزاری
- چگونه
- اما
- HTML
- HTTPS
- یکسان
- غیرقانونی
- تصویر
- تصاویر
- تصور کنید
- تحمیل
- بهبود
- in
- درآمد
- هندوستان
- نقض
- موسسه
- فکری
- مالکیت معنوی
- علاقه
- جالب
- موقت
- دخالت
- IP
- موضوع
- صادر
- مسائل
- ITS
- پادشاه
- دانستن
- آزمایشگاه ها
- بعد
- اجازه
- سبک
- محدود شده
- دعوی قضایی
- آرم
- با مسئولیت محدود
- ساخته
- تولید
- علامت
- ماده
- حداکثر عرض
- ممکن است..
- با
- گم
- اخلاقی
- mr
- نقاشی دیواری
- شبکه
- نوامبر
- مشاهده
- of
- ارائه
- on
- باز کن
- or
- سفارش
- سفارشات
- سازمان یافته
- دیگر
- خارج
- بسته بندی
- احزاب
- حزب
- پرداخت
- انتظار
- دائمي
- دارویی
- محل
- افلاطون
- هوش داده افلاطون
- PlatoData
- لطفا
- شعر
- پست
- پست ها
- در حال حاضر
- قبلا
- از اصول
- خصوصی
- روش
- محصولات
- سود
- ویژگی
- طرح پیشنهادی
- فراهم می کند
- عمومی
- پرسش و پاسخ
- سوال
- خواندن
- واقعا
- دلیل
- دلایل
- با توجه
- ثبت نام
- ثبت کننده
- ثبت
- تنظیم
- تنظیم کننده
- رد شد..
- مربوط
- تسکین
- تکیه بر
- تجدید
- شهرت
- رستوران
- این فایل نقد می نویسید:
- دور
- قانون
- قوانین
- s
- سعید
- همان
- بخش
- به دنبال
- خدمات
- تنظیم
- محیط
- باید
- مشابه
- پس از
- برخی از
- دولت
- خیابان
- کت و شلوار
- SVG
- سیستم
- گرفتن
- هدف
- پیشرفته
- مدت
- قوانین و مقررات
- که
- La
- شان
- آنها
- خودشان
- در آن
- اینها
- آنها
- این
- اگر چه؟
- بدین ترتیب
- به
- تجارت
- علامت تجارتی
- نرم افزار مارک تجاری
- علائم تجاری
- آموزش
- محاکمه
- دو
- زیر
- us
- استفاده
- استفاده کنید
- استفاده
- با استفاده از
- واکسن
- سرمایه گذاری
- نقض
- vs
- دیوار
- بود
- we
- وب سایت
- هفتگی
- بود
- چه زمانی
- هر زمان که
- که
- ویکیپدیا
- اراده
- با
- بدون
- تعجب
- کلمات
- جهان
- خواهد بود
- نوشته
- کتبی
- سال
- زفیرنت