Få ordning på Fintech-kaoset (Joris Lochy)

Ordet "Fintech" has become such a hype and such a widely used term, that it can actually mean anything today. Therefore when people ask for trends in the Fintech industry, this becomes harder and harder to answer, as anything even remotely associated with financial services can be linked to Fintech.
Additionally traditional financial players (like banks, insurers, brokers, stock exchanges, but also traditional financial software vendors like Temenos, Sopra, Fiserv…​) have also caught up in their digitalization and modernization roadmaps and have launched Fintech innovation labs, meaning they can just as well be categorized under Fintech.

Vi kan därför säga att:

• As Tekniken har blivit så avgörande inom finansbranschen, kan hela sektorn för finansiella tjänster kategoriseras som Fintech.

• På grund av den ökning av ekosystem och inbyggd finans, financial services companies start to offer more and more services in adjacent sectors (like HR Tech, MarketingTech/MadTech, EdTech, AccountingTech…​) and also players from other industries start to offer more and more financial services. E.g. big tech players like Apple (offering Apple Pay, Apple Pay Later and a credit card together with Goldman Sachs), Uber (offering Uber Wallet and Uber Debit and Credit card), Alibaba (with AliPay) or Grab (with GrabFin and products like Earn+), but also eCommerce players like Shopify (offering Shopify Capital to give fast business loans and cash advances) or TelCo players (like Safaricom’s M-Pesa, Turkcell’s Paycell, Telefónica Movistar Money or Orange Bank) have all entered the financial services sector. As a result, Fintech-gränserna suddas till och med ut i andra sektorer.

Allt detta betyder att det blir väldigt svårt att prata om Fintech som helhet.
När det blir så rörigt, kategorisering är en typisk mänsklig reflex.
Unfortunately categorization is not that easy as you can categorize across multiples axes (based on product offering, type of customers serviced, region…​) and obviously many players cannot be put in 1 category, as they provide different products and services in different markets.
Ändå kan kategorisering fortfarande ge några intressanta insikter på den totala marknaden, vilket gör det fortfarande till en mycket intressant och användbar övning.

När man tittar på olika kategoriseringsaxlar, jag identifierade följande axlar (även om den här listan definitivt inte är komplett):

Yxa 1: kategorisera enligt målkundsgrupp

Detta gör det möjligt att kategorisera Fintech-industrin i tre stora grupper:

• Direkta leverantörer av finansiella tjänster, which will target (end-) customers directly. This group can be split in B2C (e.g. neobanks like Revolut and Monzo), B2B (e.g. neobanks like Starling Bank) or even B2B2C players (i.e. offering a service to a private customer, but via a business paying for this service, e.g. Klarna) players. Often Fintech players will also target a specific customer niche, which is underserved or not sufficiently and personally addressed, e.g. freelancers (e.g. Lili), immigrants (e.g. Majority), women (e.g. Herconomy), the LGBTQ+ community (e.g. Pride bank or Daylight), specific professions (lawyers, doctors, artists…​)…​

• Leverantörer av tjänster och produkter för (andra) finansiella tjänsteföretag (like incumbent banks and insurers, but also other new (disruptive Fintech) players). This group can be split according to which companies they offer services to, i.e. services to incumbent banks, incumbent insurers, incumbent infrastructure players or new (Fintech) players. Examples in this group are the traditional financial software vendors like Temenos, Fiserv, SOPRA…​, but also new players like e.g. ComplyAdvantage.

• Leverantörer av tjänster och produkter till företag inom andra sektorer(företag som behöver finansiella data eller tjänster för att ge en bättre användarupplevelse för sina kunder) att göra en brygga (integrera) till finansiella tjänster. Obviously this group can be split depending on which other sector they offer financial service integration services to, e.g. eCommerce, HR & Payroll Tech, MobilityTech, AccountingTech, MadTech, Real Estate Tech…​ Examples in this group are PSPs like Stripe, Paypal and Adyen.

Yxa 2: kategorisera enligt störande natur av företaget

• Fintechs erbjuder befintliga finansiella tjänster och produkter. These are players that are typically challenging existing players by offering similar services and products but cheaper, more digital and/or with a better user experience. Often they target also specific groups which are excluded or underserved (e.g. products and services not adapted to their specific needs and desires) in the traditional financial landscape (i.e. financial inclusion). In this category, you can find the typical neo-banks or challenger banks (e.g. Revolut, Monzo, N26…​), which still sell mainly traditional banking products, like current and saving accounts, credits, investments and/or debit and credit cards.
  I denna kategori kan vi även hitta handels-/investeringsplattformar som t.ex. Robin Hood.

• Fintechs erbjuder synliga mervärdestjänster utöver befintliga finansiella tjänsteprodukter, typically offering a more guided advise and more embedded experiences. Typical examples are robo-advisors and personal financial management tools, but also financial marketplaces (e.g. Raisin for deposits) and price comparators (e.g. Financer.com).

• Fintechs fungerar som en osynlig back-end-leverantör till traditionella finansiella aktörer. Denna kategori tillhandahåller outsourcing av mjukvara och affärsbearbetning till finansiella aktörer.

• Fintechs erbjuder alternativa finansiella tjänster och produkter, i.e. products and services which challenge the existing landscape in a more fundamental way, by redesigning the intermediation function of banks and insurers. Typical examples in this category are P2P lenders, crowdfunding, DeFi…​

Denna kategorisering kommer också att avgöra om Fintech-spelaren fungerar som en konkurrent, partner eller leverantör till befintliga spelare.

Often Fintechs start in the first category (disrupting the market with large ambitions), but soon notice the difficulties and costs to attack the market directly and therefore pivot into partnering with existing players to profit from their existing reputation, expertise, financial means and customer basis. For the incumbent player, they offer a very quick and low risk way to offer additional innovative services to their customers.

Yxa 3: kategorisera enligt typ och omfattning av de tjänster som erbjuds av företaget

Självklart är mjukvara alltid en integrerad del av tjänsteutbudet för varje Fintech, men denna programvara kan vara huvudprodukten eller ett stödverktyg för att erbjuda en annan tjänst.
Vi kan göra en uppdelning baserat på:

• Är företaget erbjuder endast en specifik produkt eller ett helt sortiment, e.g. a specific product could be a RegTech vendor (e.g. Chainalysis), while BaaS players (Banking as a Service, e.g. solarisBank, MangoPay, Marqeta…​) typically offer a whole range of products?

• Är fokus på säljer programvara eller är programvaran en möjlighet att sälja andra tjänster, i.e. financial services, business process outsourcing, legal/compliance/risk management…​? E.g. traditional financial software providers (e.g. Temenos, SOPRA, FiServ, Infosys..) are still offering solutions deployed on-premise (or in private cloud) and via a licensing model, but more and more companies (including those traditional players) are offering their software in a SaaS (software as a service) model or even a BaaS model (Business/Banking as a Service).

• Är företaget också använder sina licenser erhållits från finansiella tillsynsmyndigheter (t.ex. banklicens, betalningsinstitutslicens, elektroniska penninginstitutslicens, kreditinstitutslicens...) som ett kommersiellt förslag?

Yxa 4: kategorisera enligt typ av tjänst och/eller produkt som erbjuds

Detta är en typ av kategorisering som är mycket vanligt förekommande och som till och med fick en specifik terminologi, i uppföljning av termen Fintech, som WealthTech, RegTech...
De typiska kategorierna här är:

• BankTech (Digital banking). This group contains on the one hand the disruptive neobanks like Chime, Nubank, Revolut, Monzo, Atom, N26 or Starling and on the other hand the BaaS (Banking as a Service) platforms like solarisBank, Bankable or Cambr. We could also include in this category (although often also put as a separate category) the PFM companies (Personal Financial Management), that offer advice and help with budgeting, e.g. Mint, Acorns, PocketGuard, Level Money, YNAB (You Need A Budget), Intuit, Wally…​

• Wealthtech (Digital Wealth Management): this contains a whole group of Fintech offerings to invest money in financial assets (like stocks, bonds…​) in a better way (more user friendly, cheaper, more automated…​). This category can be split-up in 2 sub-blocks, i.e.:

  • RoboAdvisors, som erbjuder smart algoritmteknik för att ge investeringsrådgivning och rekommendationer. T.ex. Wealthfront, Acorns, Betterment, Wealthsimple, Charles Schwab, Vanguard...

  • Retail Investment-plattformar, t.ex. Robinhood, Tradier, E*Trade, Interactive Brokers, iCapital…​

• LendingTech eller LendTech (Credits): providing all types of new digital solutions to consumers and businesses (usually small businesses) for lending money in a more efficient and faster way (often using new technologies like AI/ML, digital identity management…​). This space is enormous as well, going from P2P Lending (like LendingClub, Prosper or OnDeck) and Crowdlending platforms (like Indiegogo, Kickstarter, GoFundMe or Patreon), over BNPL (Buy Now Pay Later, like Affirm, Klarna or AfterPay) all the way to digital lenders (like Funding Circle, Kabbage, Lendio, Lending Club, SoFi or Better Mortgage), credits based on new collaterals like invoicing factoring (e.g. Bluevine, Resolve, altLine…​) and alternative credit (scoring) systems (e.g. micro-lending) allowing to offer credits to the unbanked and underbanked (like Credit Karma, Nova Credit, Quizzle, Credit Sesame or Tala).

• RegTech: this group of companies helps financial service firms via innovative technology to meet regulatory compliance and security rules, with a strong focus on AML (Anti-Money Laundering), KYC (Know Your Customer protocols) and all financial directives like Basel II/III/IV, FATCA, MiFID, Solvency II…​ Often those companies provide also access to large amounts of financial research and data, used to verify compliance of customers and transactions. Examples are companies like Alyne, Suade, DataGuard, ComplyAdvantage, Fenergo, Onfido, Chainalysis, Ascent Regtech, Hummingbird…​

• InsurTech: these companies seek to use technical innovation to simplify and streamline the insurance business model. Typically they focus on delivering insurance quotes online in a matter of minutes , digitize the whole claim management process and provide alternative insurance underwriting (using new data sources), e.g. Usage Based Insurance (UBI). Examples are companies like Oscar Health, Gusto, Clover Health, Lemonade, Qover, Digit Insurance, Policy Bazaar…​

• PayTech (Payment technology): these companies provide different tools to make payment transactions as secure and efficient (frictionless) as possible. A lot of well-known (Fintech) names are in this space, like Paypal, VISA, MasterCard, Stripe, Venmo, AliPay, Adyen, Mollie, Square, Wise, Ripple, iZettle…​ This category can be split in players that

  • Underlätta betalningar för handlare både fysiska via enheter på försäljningsstället och online (t.ex. Stripe, Paypal, VIVA Wallet, Adyen, Mollie, SumUp...​),

  • Tillhandahålla nya mobila betalningslösningar (P2P och med handlare), som Venmo, Payconiq, AliPay…

  • Underlätta internationella pengaöverföringar, som Wise eller Ripple

• Infrastrukturaktörer who provide the underlying gateways and connectivity to other players in the industry (other banks, stock exchanges, data providers, regulatory instances…​). Important in this group are the players offering services to enable and consume Open Banking, like Tink, Plaid or TrueLayer.

• Infrastrukturaktörer who provide the underlying gateways and connectivity to other players in the industry (other banks, stock exchanges, data providers, regulatory instances…​). Important in this group are the players offering services to enable and consume Open Banking, like Tink, Plaid or TrueLayer.

• Krypto-, blockkedje- och defi-spelare: this group contains all companies building a new financial (eco)system, based on a distributed ledger technology (blockchain). This ecosystem is very disruptive, as it challenges the ground rules of our financial system. Companies like Coinbase, Alchemy, Ava Labs, Circle, Kraken, Binance, Gemini Cryptocurrency are most known in this space. Obviously this space can be split-up in multiple sub-categories like crypto-currency exchanges/trading platforms, crypto-wallet providers, NFT marketplaces, crypto-saving and crypto-lending players, players offering tooling to setup new blockchains…​

Yxa 5: kategorisera enligt land och/eller region där företaget huvudsakligen är verksamt (genererar sina intäkter).

Uppenbarligen kan vi dela upp oss utifrån kontinenter, regioner och/eller enskilda länder, men ofta ser vi en mix, baserad på gemensamma särdrag inom reglering och kultur.

Först är det några länder which due to their size (both in population and general economy, but often also more specifically due to their size of their financial services sector) and specifics. In the first place we identify here the US (main hubs in Silicon Valley, e.g. Stripe, Coinbase, Chime, Plaid, Paypal or Robinhood and New York, e.g. Better.com, Oscar, Chainalysis or Betterment), China (main hub: Beijing, e.g. Waterdrop, Ant Financial, Tencent or Lufax), India (main hub: Bengaluru, e.g. Razorpay, Digit Insurance or CRED) and Russia (main hub: Moscow, e.g. Tinkoff, Sber Bank or Yandex.Money), but we can also include Canada (main hub: Toronto, e.g. Wealthsimple, FreshBooks or Clearco), Australia (main hub: Melbourne, e.g. Afterpay or Airwallex), the UK (main hub: London, e.g. Checkout.com, Revolut, OakNorth or Blockchain.com) and even Israel(main hub: Tel Aviv, e.g. eToro) in this list.

Sedan finns det regioner, with a lot of commonalities, where often Fintechs active in one country will quite fast expand to other countries in that same region, e.g. South-East Asia (main hubs in Singapore, e.g. Arttha, Go-Jek or Coda Payments, Hong Kong, e.g. Amber Group or Babel Finance and Jakarta in Indonesia, e.g. OVO, Mandiri or Linkaja), the Middle East(main hubs in Dubai, e.g. Souqalmal.com or Beehive and Abu Dhabi, e.g. NymCard), LatAm (main hub: São Paulo Brasil, e.g. Nubank, C6 Bank or Creditas), the European Union (main hubs in Paris, e.g. Qonto, Sorare, Alan or Ledger, Amsterdam/The Hague, e.g. Adyen, Mollie, Mambu or Bunq, Berlin, e.g. N26, wefox or Trade Republic, Dublin, e.g. Stripeo or WordRemit and Vilnius Lithuania, e.g. Kevin, Nordigen or Bankera), Scandinavia (main hub: Stockholm, e.g. Klarna) or Africa (main hubs in Johannesburg South Africa, e.g. Prosperian Capital or Pineapple, LagosNigeria, e.g. Opay, Flutterwave or Paga and Nairobi Kenia, e.g. Abacus or CarePay).

Hoppas detta kan ge en uppfattning om hur Fintech-branschen skulle kunna kategoriseras. Som en Fintech-start-up är det viktigt att veta i vilken kategori du är placerad idag och vilka (intilliggande) kategorier du eftersträvar på medellång och lång sikt.
Opportunistic pivoting might also be required. E.g. many Fintechs start in a disruptive model (competing against incumbents), but gradually transform to a partner/supplier model with incumbents. E.g. A lot of neobanks are focusing strongly on a BaaS model (e.g. Starling bank "Starling as a Service" or Fidor bank) or certain PFM apps have switched in offering infrastructure and value-added services directly to banks (e.g. Tink or Cake). But the opposite can exist as well, i.e. Fintechs offering value-added services can become so successful, that they can start expanding to all banking services and products.

Självklart varje kategori kommer med sin egen komplexitet. A business model based on an improving of existing products and services means a lot of competition and thus a lot of upfront investment to stand out of all other players (cfr. neobanks), while alternative or innovative products mean less competition, but require a challenging and pioneering journey (on technology, marketing and legal/regulatory domains) of convincing customers of the need of the product (shaping a new market).

Kolla in alla mina bloggar på https://bankloch.blogspot.com/